Peer review is central to maintaining the quality, credibility, and integrity of scholarly publishing at Femington. Reviewers play a critical role by providing independent, expert evaluation of submitted manuscripts and supporting well-informed editorial decisions.
Thoughtful peer review grounded in independent scholarly judgment.
Clarity & Role DefinitionFemington welcomes expressions of interest from qualified researchers and professionals with relevant expertise.
Researchers with completed or ongoing doctoral studies in relevant subject areas and expertise.
Early-career researchers with postdoctoral experience and active scholarly research involvement.
Professionals with peer-reviewed publications and recognized expertise relevant to the journal’s scope.
University-affiliated scholars who are actively engaged in research and academic publishing.
Expectation SettingReviewers at Femington are expected to provide objective, constructive, and timely evaluations of assigned manuscripts.
Assessing originality, methodological approach, and scholarly contribution
Evaluating clarity, structure, and relevance to the journal’s scope
Identifying ethical concerns or potential conflicts of interest
Providing clear, respectful, and actionable feedback to editors
Submitting reviews within agreed timelines and review guidelines
Note: Reviewers provide recommendations, not publication decisions. Final decisions rest with the editor(s).
Work FlowPeer review at Femington critically evaluates methodology, evidence, and scholarly contribution by independent experts.
The reviewer accepts or declines the editor’s invitation based on expertise and availability.
The reviewer critically reads the manuscript and evaluates its originality, methodology, clarity, and relevance.
The reviewer submits feedback and recommends acceptance, revision, or rejection.
The review is submitted confidentially, and the reviewer’s identity is protected where applicable.
The editor reviews the reviewer’s input, as the final decision is not made by the reviewer.
Reviewer may be invited to assess revised manuscript
Work FlowWe value the expertise and scholarly contributions of peer reviewers through professional recognition.
Official certificates recognizing verified review contributions as formal documentation of a reviewer’s scholarly service.
Reviewer names may be listed annually on the Femington website (with consent) in recognition of their contribution to the peer-review process.
Active reviewers demonstrating high-quality evaluations may be considered for future editorial or advisory opportunities, subject to editorial requirements.
Inviting qualified researchers and professionals to support the advancement of scholarly publishing through peer review.
